Auto Ethnography Draft #3

Jake Pavlica
Composing the Self
Auto-Ethnography
Draft #3

Who are we and what defines us

In the early morning hours, the shades still shut preventing the grey gloom of the morning from fulling waking me, I catch a glimpse of myself in the mirror. Like a stranger passing on the street I don’t often give myself a second glance when I pass my reflection. On this day I turned back around and faced myself. It dawned on me that rarely do I look at myself in the mirror . Brushing my teeth and thinking about which plaid shirt I’ll wear today a singular question pings around my head like a pin ball machine; who am I?
I usually don’t give such existential questions the time of day. Asking myself metaphysical questions has never been something that gives me clarity, rather it just clouds my mind with so much thought that I begin picking apart every aspect of my being until only the surface level exoskeleton remains. For this reason I found this question interesting to explore. What really makes up an identity? The first thing I jump to is my experience. I have gone through public schooling, found a passion for art, and I’m fond of weekend debauchery just the same as many others. The small details of the categories we put ourselves in are the ones that make up our own ideas of ourselves.
With this exhibition into the heart of identity I will be interviewing others to find out what it is that makes us tick. For many, the culture they were born into becomes a primary baseline for their personality. Being born into religion, or a deeply rooted culture becomes our first insight into morality, the self, and our own ideals. It can act as guidelines for many; a set of rules to make life more understandable and structured. What I am curious to find out is what happens when someone begins to stray from the lifestyle they have been immersed in since birth. How do we find ourselves again when we begin swimming agains the current of the ideals we have been taught to be sacred.
One thing that is always brought up when speaking about identity is the concept of nature versus nurture. Nature versus nurture posits whether or not we are the sum of our genetics or the product of our environment. For many, the genetics they are given is a major source of their identity, given that certain aspects of life can be easier or difficult judging by the genetic code you are given. Our appearance is what shapes our interactions with society; how people treat us and the groups we find ourselves connecting with. Outside of society comes nurture, which relates to our home and family values. Nurture seeks to understand how our family atmosphere dictates our morales and worldview. The two terms are very much interconnected. I for one think it isn’t a versus relationship, but more of the two walking hand and hand. Either can be supported by the other, but the important takeaway is how does it determine your own mindset.
I was born a white male. Needless to say I have not faces the same amount of adversity as others who have faced systematic oppression in our society. Life can be hard for everyone at times, but being born a white male means that my skin color or gender has never been a factor that made life more difficult. I have always seen myself as an ally to those who have been through hardship with how society or their family has treated them. Though I cannot always relate to someones experience with hardship I lend a empathetic ear to them in order to find out what they have been through and what small things I can do to lessen that burden.
I have a great deal of friends who have experienced being an outsider in places that should feel like homes. In my interviews I will ask the following questions to get down to the root of what it is that led them to the paths they are on now.

(This is where the interviews will come be placed, followed by my other research)

  • In what cultural would you say you belong?
    • How do you think that culture has influenced you? (both good and bad)
    • Have there been times where familial or societal standards have challenged your personal beliefs?
    • Describe your childhood? What things stick out? (Cultural or religious practices)
    • Do you think your beliefs were shaped by your environment growing up? Were they determined by your own truth seeking?
    • Was there ever moment where you questioned the beliefs you had been taught? Was there an incident that brought up this questioning?
    • What was your early adolescence like? What were some challenges you faced?
    • When do you feel most like yourself?
    • What culture would you say you belong in now?

(Research to be reworded and integrated)
Walter Mischel’s Theory of Personality states that an individual’s behavior is influenced by two things- the specific attributes of a given situation and the manner in which he perceives the situation. In contrast to the traditional social cognitive theories, Mischel argued that a person only behaves in a similar manner whenever these actions are highly probable to yield into the same results. He emphasized that we have individual differences, so our values and expectancies must be consider in predicting a person’s behavior and personality.
According to Mischel, there are five person variables that contribute to the conditions of a specific situation. They are used in predicting how a person will most likely behave.
1 Competencies – our intellectual capabilities as well as social skills.
2 Cognitive Strategies – the different perceptions of a specific event. For instance, what may be “threatening” for you may be “challenging” to another person.
3 Expectancies – the expected results of different behaviors that are realized by the person inside his mind.
4 Subjective Values – the respective value of each possible outcomes of various behaviors.
5 Self-regulatory systems – the groups of rules and standards that people adapt to in order to regulate their behavior.
https://explorable.com/social-cognitive-theories-of-personality

How much are these traits influenced by genetics, according to the latest science?
1 Personality 40%
2 General intelligence (eg reasoning) 50%
3 Spatial ability (eg navigation) 70%
4 Remembering faces 60%
5 Verbal ability 60%
6 School achievement 60%
7 Reading disability 60%
8 Autism 70%
9 Schizophrenia 50%
10 Stomach ulcers 70%
11 Breast cancer 10%
12 Weight 70%
13 Height 80%
14 Eye color 95%
https://www.noted.co.nz/currently/science/nature-vs-nurture-how-much-genes-determine-identity/

(The role of education- school environment socially- and academically- seeing new perspectives)
We develop our identity through our relationships. Our first impression of friendship and connection comes from our parents, but that attention at times feels like a technicality. We cannot choose our family and we are older by that familial relationship. The family we can chose are our friends. As a child I felt that my personality was split down the middle between the one that my parents saw and my friends saw. Around my parents I was innocent, polite and respectful, but around ym friends I unleashed some primal version of myself. I think this dichotomy is common when discovering what we are really all about. At some point the two personalities we juggle between these two enrollments converges and becomes who we display to the world.

3 thoughts on “Auto Ethnography Draft #3

  1. Hey Jake,
    This draft is a lot more developed than your last — you really begin to integrate your research well. Although it is not all in narrative form yet, I can see how each research source is going to fit into your ethnography well. Again, the beginning of your story (you stopping to look at yourself in the mirror and ask yourself this question) is really engaging. I also think your interview questions are perfect for understanding what makes someone who they are. Nice draft!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Love your introduction. It’s so personal and cinematic- I can really visualize this scene. With this said, as I mentioned in class, the transition between that intro and the second paragraph (“With this exhibition into the heart of identity I will be interviewing others to find out what it is that makes us tick.”) can be switched to blend those two together with ease and keep readers in the mood to hear a *story*.

    Other note (as I also mentioned in class) is about the possibility of bringing in stats about nature vs. nurture and which side of the argument is preferred by society. Could be interesting to incorporate here!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Jake: It appears that this is your fruitful question: “What I am curious to find out is what happens when someone begins to stray from the lifestyle they have been immersed in since birth. How do we find ourselves again when we begin swimming agains the current of the ideals we have been taught to be sacred.”

    Are you possibly a “someone” straying from your inherited lifestyle – the existence into which we are all born? If so then you could personalize this inquiry with your own journey, noting the get-go (your beginnings) and then bringing us to the points along the way where you felt yourself straying – and then perhaps a bit lost (as you ask how do we “find” ourselves again?) And when we do find ourselves are we a revised version of how we began? I suppose we would all like to think this is possible – that we do have the power within ourselves to “revise” ourselves, and that we are not all “stamped” from the get-go of life with unalterable and predictable outcomes.

    Around your own journey – which would be the organizing principle of this composition – as Claire notes, a “story” – you can fold in your interviews with others in ways that support, refute, enlarge, or narrow your topic. And you can also bring in research as a way of grounding this journey in science (nature – biological science) vs. nurture – social science). I tend to agree with your posit that this is not a “versus” – either/or – but rather a collaboration between nature and nurture, which each influence our growth and development as individuals.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment